Monday, December 17, 2012

Web business brings structure to cash donations ... - The Olympian

ROLF BOONE | Staff writer ? Published December 16, 2012 Modified December 15, 2012

Co-founders: Roderick Campbell, Jay Bolton and the two founders of MerchantOS, Justin Laing and Ivan Stanojevic.

Location: 711 Capitol Way, Olympia.

Years in business: CommitChange went live Dec. 5.

Website: commitchange.com

Service: Online fundraising site for nonprofits, beginning with several in Thurston County.

Did you know? Both Campbell and Bolton are recent graduates of The Evergreen State College. Bolton, after first studying at St. John?s College in New Mexico, transferred to Evergreen to study computer science, while Campbell studied sociology. Campbell also brings a worldwide view to CommitChange, having spent time in as many as 30 countries growing up. His parents believed in the value of travel, so they would live in one place to earn money, then move to their next destination. One of his favorite places is Lhasa, Tibet, Campbell said. Although he has traveled around the world, he considers Casper, Wyo., to be home. Software developer Jay Bolton had developed a Web-based recurring payment system, but he and business partner Roderick Campbell were unsure of how to apply it to the real world. That was until Campbell struck on the idea of applying it to nonprofits, creating an Internet startup focused on fundraising for those organizations.

The result is CommitChange, which went ?live? Dec. 5 and is now seeking a wider audience and outside investors.

Bolton, Campbell, in charge of business and marketing, and the two co-founders of MerchantOS, an Olympia-based company that developed one of the first Web-based point-of-sale software systems for retailers, are the founders behind CommitChange. Their Web designer is James Franzen.

CommitChange is more than a website PayPal ?donate? button or the one-time funds generated by sites such as Kickstarter, Campbell said, offering instead a deeper experience for the donor interested in a local nonprofit.

?Donors don?t always see the tangible impact of their dollars,? he said.

Using the recurring payment system, donors can contribute as little as $10 a month to the nonprofit of their choice, such as Garden Raised Bounty (GRuB), Harlequin Productions, SafePlace and the Washington Center for the Performing Arts.

CommitChange is working with 30 to 35 nonprofits, mostly in Thurston County, with room to grow to 50, Campbell said.

SafePlace executive director Mary Pontarolo praised the site, saying it gives potential donors the time to make thoughtful, planned donations on a regular basis. In return, Safe Place also can set up a corresponding ?thank you? system to make its donor relationships grow, she said. It?s also more exposure for SafePlace in the community.

?I see it growing exponentially,? she said about local giving to SafePlace.

CommitChange offers detailed profiles of the nonprofits, including videos and statistics, plus donors can build their own profiles, either public or private, that tracks their donations and achievements.

Donor amounts are not disclosed, he said.

One key aspect of the business is that it can track a donors overall ?network impact? ? aided by its integration with Facebook ? showing the number of donors recruited by one person and the total amount of money raised. CommitChange, meanwhile, makes its money by charging the nonprofits a transaction and service fee, Campbell said. ?The cost to be in our database is zero,? Bolton added.

Up next for the startup is to raise $200,000 to $300,000 by the end of the first quarter, hopefully with the assistance of an angel investor ? those high-net-worth individuals who are looking to invest.

?We want to work with people who really get what we?re doing socially,? Campbell said.

Rolf Boone: 360-754-5403 rboone@theolympian.com theolympian.com/bizblog @rolf_boone

Source: http://www.theolympian.com/2012/12/16/2355201/web-business-brings-structure.html

colorectal cancer metta kashi neil diamond orange crush

Sunday, December 16, 2012

"How can I make running outside in cold weather more bearable?"

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/full/~3/Y8rVKC1x2Cs/how-can-i-make-running-outside-in-cold-weather-more-bearable

B H c mitt romney mark zuckerberg mark zuckerberg maurice jones drew

Tripple, Tripple & Tripple, LLC Video | Insurance Services in ...

December 16th, 2012 by admin

edmonds.komonews.com Tripple, Tripple & Tripple, LLC is an independent insurance agency established in 1898 by Robert A. Tripple. Tripple?s have been serving their clients through five generations in the greater Puget Sound area of Washington State. Our agency writes property, casualty, surety, marine and auto insurance coverage?s for both personal and commercial clients. We?re committed to building long term relationships with our clients and working with them to help protect their assets. We will work with you and the companies we represent to provide you with coverage options tailored to your individual needs. Please give us a call to discuss your insurance coverage?s today. 12537600 Insurance, Auto Insurance, Home Insurance, Condo Insurance, Renter?s Insurance, Boat and Watercraft Insurance, Motorcycle Insurance, Landlord Protection, Classic Car Insurance, Umbrella Insurance, Business Insurance, Washington, KOMO
Video Rating: 5 / 5

www.dexknows.com Welcome to Ames Insurance Center! We offer fantastic coverage options at low competitive rates. Our first goal is to work with our clients to ensure they have what they need to feel protected. From home and business insurance, to vehicle and personal property coverage, well create a plan for you.
Video Rating: 0 / 5

VN:F [1.9.21_1169]

Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

VN:F [1.9.21_1169]

Source: http://makemoneyhomebusinesscenter.com/tripple-tripple-tripple-llc-video-insurance-services-in-edmonds/

sag awards 2012 nominees sag awards pro bowl 2012 roster yamaguchi road house occupy oakland occupy oakland

Saturday, December 15, 2012

98% Brooklyn Castle

All Critics (45) | Top Critics (20) | Fresh (44) | Rotten (1)

"Brooklyn Castle" easily checkmates your inner cynic.

Katie Dellamaggiore's lively and affecting documentary introduces us to a cast of characters that's very winning (in both senses of the word).

It's not To Sir, With Love: It's fierce ambition, the channeling of emotion, and hours of drilling.

Enlightening, inspiring and expertly crafted.

An irresistibly uplifting doc.

Castle is suspenseful, funny and, particularly in its depiction of the challenging home lives of some of the kids, moving.

... a powerful and positive story about dedicated teachers helping kids succeed no matter what their circumstances

Like chess, not exactly a high-energy experience but seeing what these kids accomplish, seemingly against all odds is breathtaking all the same.

...provides a corrective to the popular image of American schools as obsessed with sports and popularity, and it makes the strongest possible case for funding after-school activities.

Chess, brilliant young students and great teachers potent mix.

The I.S. 318 team? A delightfully motley, vulnerable, multicultural bunch, whose addiction to chess has allowed them higher aspirations for top high schools and, eventually, college and careers. You will root for them like crazy.

We meet five of the team's members and several of their teachers; by its end, you'll be rooting for them all.

"BROOKLYN CASTLE is a compelling, engaging and inspiring Documentary, featuring Junior High kids that you can relate to. Even if you don't know the game of Chess all too well, it won't stop you from enjoying this pleasant film."

Brooklyn Castle provides a snapshot of indomitable American can-do attitude, and gives one hope.

The admirable Brooklyn Castle transcends its formula to become an optimistic look at extracurricular education and young people.

Great story, well-made, what's not to like?

It's clear that chess isn't just a game; for these students, it can also open doors.

No quotes approved yet for Brooklyn Castle. Logged in users can submit quotes.

Source: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/brooklyn_castle_2012/

navy seal team 6 tim gunn tim gunn built to last obama state of the union address 2012 mitt romney tax return flip saunders

Helping You To Tony Romo Jersey Understand How Computer ...

Posted by SpenglerMarcano990 on December 14, 2012 in Articles with No Comments


From Nintendo wii to Sega to Tony Romo Jersey Xbox 360 Console, there are plenty of games available today. Even if you?re unable to video game with a console, your computer can start to play several game titles as well. Continue reading to lift up your game interest to a new level.

Prior to deciding to devote lots of money on such things as controllers or storage greeting cards, search the web for any employed model. At times a shop will be out of utilized online game hardware, which can be very economical. Ensure you examine a web-based seller?s responses before making the purchase which means you determine if you?re obtaining the things you purchased.

Be really cautious about things totally free on earth Tony Romo Jersey of online gaming. Generally, when you are offered anything for nothing at all, you will have a catch. You may be disclosing your pc to vicious software program or opening your budget without realizing it. Be intelligent and listen to it amazing with game giveaways!

Really know what microtransactions are. A lot of games now rely on these in video game dealings for sometimes some and even their earnings. Often Tony Romo Jersey associated with a credit or debit greeting card, it is possible to end up shelling out a lot of cash inside an activity on online or superior content material rather than know exactly how much you happen to be truly paying.

Make the most for your money and buy video gaming utilized. Whether it isn?t required to get games after they very first appear, hold off until you can purchase a pre-owned copy. It is possible to conserve a small amount of dollars by doing this but still benefit from the activity.

If you are searching Tony Romo Jersey into developing a video games catalogue but don?t have a lot of money, you need to start looking at pc gaming. There are lots of able to enjoy games which can be very addictive on the pc. Start by getting water vapor, a client that actually works similar to the Itunes of online games.

Are you presently caught up on one thing in the online game you happen to be actively playing? Get on the web! You will find almost certainly other people who have a similar issues. A great deal of occasions many people get on the internet and share how they obtained their way out of a tacky situation. Or, you will find tricks to the activity that can help.

Rent payments online games. Several games tend not to require much time to overcome or that you should decide you don?t like. As an alternative to Tony Romo Jersey paying a great deal of money on a game, hire it. There are actually on the internet alternatives in addition to online video fingers stores that lease video games. Save cash and rent payments.

Be sure the video games you get your youngsters are age group proper. You can find outstanding video games on the market that improve a child?s memory as well as help them understand school subject matter. Moreover, these game titles are fun. But smaller kids should not enjoy really aggressive video games. Studies show these games uninteresting children to the results and implications of violence in real life.

No matter what you employ to experience video gaming, whether it be your computer, cellphone or console, provided that you have an Internet connection, game playing is possible. The tips can help you improve your video game taking part in encounter.

Go for all sorts of economical http://www.thenflcowboys.com/2012-dallas-cowboys-team-jerseys-miles-austin-jersey-c-1.html straight away with instant distribution, risk-free payment & impressive customer care from acknowledged Sean Lee Jersey shop.

You may follow the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are closed.

Source: http://darululoomnewcastle.co.za/?p=22035

wanderlust gone tyler perry good deeds pretty in pink nba all star game shark tank john wall

Friday, December 14, 2012

Re-thinking the way colleges teach critical thinking

For the past couple years, I've been working as a science communicator on two fronts, as a freelance science writer and a community college Earth science instructor. I've seen, from many angles, the difficulty people have understanding and assessing scientific issues. With topics that are publicly contentious, those difficulties rarely arise from a simple lack of understanding. Other things get in the way. A student once said to me, "Well, I'm a conservative, so I don't believe in climate change." The frankness of that statement opens up a window into the obstacles science faces in the public sphere. (If only those who post internet comments were as honest with themselves...) The combination of science writing and education has influenced my approach to both, which share a common, overarching goal: to reach out to people and present them with the power, wonder, and relevance of science. Like most educators, one of my central aims is to impart critical thinking skills-- to help students make sound decisions in a confusing world of conflicting information, sales pitches, and smooth-talking politicians. Though critical thinking is universally regarded as a pillar of higher education (including by employers seeking college graduates), results show that students are not developing their critical thinking skills to the extent we expect. For their 2009 book, Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses, Richard Arum and Josipsa Rocksa followed a little over 2,300 college students through their first two years of school. They found "a barely noticeable impact on students' skills in critical thinking, complex reasoning, and writing" and "no statistically significant gains [in these skills] for at least 45 percent of the students." These students may be learning things, but they're not becoming better thinkers or writers. That's a remarkable failure to realize the promise of a college education--and that disappointing reality actually appears to have gotten considerably worse over the last few decades. It's irrelevant how much blame should be placed on the school and how much on the students. We must get better results. As an educator, I've constantly struggled with how to stimulate growth in these skills. In an introductory Earth science course, my first job is to teach my students about plate tectonics, soil formation, oceanic and atmospheric processes, the climate system--all the things that comprise a firm foundation to build on in further classes. But the vast majority of my students will never take another Earth science course, and while this information is still useful in their lives (a point on which they may not particularly agree in the moment), there are more important things to be teaching them. There are larger points, like the nature of science and scientific thinking, and the perspective brought on by an appreciation of the complexity of Earth systems and the mind-numbing scale of the universe. In the face of this balancing act, the traditional approach is often to simply focus on the details of a particular science (to build that foundation for prospective majors) and assume that all the students will absorb the other stuff in the process. Scientific literacy and critical thinking skills are seen as natural side-effects of studying a science. Critical thinking by osmosis. I don't think it reliably works that way, especially for students who expect to struggle with and be bored by science classes from the outset. It's easy to sit through a class, memorizing some facts and working through assignments with minimal effort, without ever actually engaging with the scientific process that created this knowledge. I fear that too many of my students have done exactly that. Increasingly, I've found myself addressing these big-picture, take-home points explicitly. For example, before the first box of minerals and rocks comes out of the closet, I now dedicate a couple weeks to critical thinking and the scientific method. This progression of teaching style reached its (perhaps) natural conclusion when I realized that what I really want to do is give these students an entire semester on critical thinking and the nature of science. And why not? Why continue to pound the square peg through a round hole, herding disinterested students through "Physics for Poets" or "Rocks for Jocks" (their calculated paths of least resistance through science requirements), hoping that they'll pick up these key skills along the way? There are many great reasons for students to experience various fields of science, but why not address critical thinking directly, as well? This is hardly a radical thought, and I'm far from the first to think it. For decades, there have been pushes to teach these skills formally, which have ebbed and flowed with the educational tides. The Association for Informal Logic & Critical Thinking and the Foundation for Critical Thinking, for example, have long been advocating for better critical thinking instruction. Where standalone critical thinking courses exist, however, they are mostly found within the humanities and social sciences. Those courses often center on argumentation and literary criticism, or instead on the philosophy of logic, but there are opportunities to expand this-- particularly by giving science a larger presence. I think there is an enormous amount of untapped value in a broader model. I envision a course that incorporates many facets of critical thinking. Students should get an introduction to logic. They should learn a bit about cognitive science to understand some of the biases and mental shortcuts we all subconsciously employ. (How can you think at a high level without the awareness that there are wayward tendencies in your thinking machine that sometimes require troubleshooting and maintenance?) They should study some of the tools of rhetoric so they can identify the art of persuasion at work, particularly when they're being targeted by it. And they should study the scientific method in this context, as a reliable guide through a treacherous terrain full of pitfalls and mirages. These topics have one big thing going for them--they lend themselves very easily to an active and engaging classroom that fosters the ideal conditions for genuine learning and development. That's a struggle in many subjects, but here it just comes naturally. Most of these concepts are best taught through application to familiar, real-world case studies. Fortunately, American culture is absolutely saturated with object lessons (Jersey Shore, anyone?) and sandboxes in which to hone skills. Student discussions absolutely beg to be facilitated--another fantastic learning environment. All students have opinions and perspectives that they bring to these issues, and the sharing and sifting of ideas among classmates should elicit the very critical thinking skills that we're after. Few things encourage intellectual maturation like recognizing and examining the assumptions behind one's opinions, and the course would be flush with opportunities to do so. Take the public conflict over vaccinations, for example. Combing through the arguments of "anti-vaccine" advocates would reveal ways in which complicated information is misinterpreted and would illustrate the persuasive power of anecdotes. Digging deeper into the science strips the issue down to what we do and do not know, and how new knowledge would be acquired. Turning to the arena of public opinion, you can evaluate how others arrive at their opinions through a range of rational and emotional avenues. From there, you're ready to put the spotlight on your own mind. How did you really form your initial opinion? Does it need to change? If you can genuinely lead students to ponder their way through those thorny thickets, how can they not come out the other side with new eyes? Like children who don't notice the vegetables hidden in their favorite cheesy casserole, I think students would actually really enjoy a class like that, challenging and cognitively nutritious though it would be. It's not hard to make this a fun and enlightening experience that sticks with students. Contrary to the criticism that classes like this would merely be weekly exercises in debunking, critical thinking is as much about problem solving and extracting meaning from complexity as it is about not falling for hokum. (Of course, conspiracy theories and sasquatches would certainly make an appearance.) And this is where science fits in so naturally. Practice with a scientific way of thinking--developing conclusions that flow from the data, rather than cherry-picking data to support your pre-existing conclusion--adds such an important tool to the kit. There is a need for a more inter-disciplinary alliance to bring many elements of critical thinking into one coherent experience for students. While each element is worthy of a semester-long deep-dive of its own, it's not easy to get even a single semester with students, and I'd argue that a broad survey is the most efficient use of that time. There are many, many factors contributing to disappointing outcomes in higher education--from changing student attitudes toward academics, to the rising tuition costs that drive students to work more while they're in school, to problems in the K-12 education system-- and there is no silver bullet that can take us were we need to go. But, as Albert Einstein recognized, "The value of an education in a liberal arts college is not the learning of many facts but the training of the mind to think something that cannot be learned from textbooks." Colleges are not like the Field of Dreams (if we build it, they will think?), and it's high time we rolled up our sleeves and got serious about making that training happen. Related: Making implicit knowledge and skills more explicit in science education Follow Scientific American on Twitter @SciAm and @SciamBlogs. Visit ScientificAmerican.com for the latest in science, health and technology news.
? 2012 ScientificAmerican.com. All rights reserved.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/thinking-way-colleges-teach-critical-thinking-172900752.html

jeb bush sherry arnold snooty fox el debarge portland weather clintonville battlestar galactica blood and chrome

Regarding making new topics,

Wolf Paw: My Mate

A wolf mates for life, but lycan's have no choice in their mates. The spirits of Artemis the goddess of the moon and the hunt choice who is best for who. It is their soulmate, their one and only, the person they were made for, that is what a mate is.

Owner:

Game Masters:

This topic is an Out Of Character part of the roleplay, ?Wolf Paw: My Mate?. Anything posted here will also show up there.

Topic Tags:

Forum for completely Out of Character (OOC) discussion, based around whatever is happening In Character (IC). Discuss plans, storylines, and events; Recruit for your roleplaying game, or find a GM for your playergroup.

why??? cause he doesnt have a mate yet?? is it boring???

User avatar
AuroraDawn
Member for 0 years



AuroraDawn and HadenRivers,

Please respond to already-existing topics rather than making a new one every time you need to say something. Additionally, please add subjects to your topics to make them accessible. The reply box can be found at the bottom of an already existing topic.

Thank you.

User avatar
Curtsive
Global Moderator
Member for 0 years



Post a reply

RolePlayGateway is a site built by a couple roleplayers who wanted to give a little something back to the roleplay community. The site has no intention of earning any profit, and is paid for out of their own pockets.

If you appreciate what they do, feel free to donate your spare change to help feed them on the weekends. After selecting the amount you want to donate from the menu, you can continue by clicking on PayPal logo.

Who is online

Registered users: 0neTailedf0x*, Adantas*, Akita, akjadestar*, Alisa, All7, amelia-anne*, Aniihya, aodhstormeyes*, ArielKJ, Arik223, Asher MstrImmortalis*, Asper, AthaNielsen, AuroraDawn, AuthorAnnon*, AxelZero93, Azrieldemourn, bandgeek*, Banshee*, Basta*, BBClock*, Beach-Born-Boy, bizarre1*, Blackbird26*, BleedingLover*, Bonjour51*, BraceBlaze, BumbleDrop*, Cadounus, Caged IceWolf*, ceh12, Celedia*, ChaoticMarin*, CharlotteV, CherryRed*, Chuckles*, Chynacat32, Cienpher*, CoffeeLorencia*, Constellations, CookieCupcake, coricidinForte, CptxMorgan, CrashQueen*, Crimbro, CriminalMinds*, Crooked Thoughts*, Crystal Flamedance, Curtsive*, Daakukage, Dante Angelico*, DarlingRapture*, dealing with it, Deallo*, deathrisesagain*, DemonDante*, DetectiveLushy, Diarmuid O'Dyna*, dig17, Digital_Muse*, Dmitrij Rosha, DocBlargle, DontBeMad*, Dreamalot106*, DuBois_Scarlett, EarthWanderer08*, Eddy V. Sovorov*, EKRonnie, Elfangor*, EspressoJunkie, Euphrasie, Exabot [Bot], FamishedPants, Fated, fauxtruth*, Fearful-lover*, Finalhazard3*, Flame1819, flickery, flying monkey child, FollowerOfDarkPaths*, Forensic_Anthro, freakofnature, Genesis Rhapsodos, Ghost_Scar, Gintoki Sakata, Gladis*, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Gray, Gustof26*, Haas33*, Hallowed777*, Hazezon*, Heirii13, HereMeNow, HitoriRaven, Hoga, holothewisewolf*, HOLYCRAPAGHOST, HolyEssence*, Horseygirl, Howlkin Stranger*, Hyperiant, Igari*, Ikuto Tsukiyomi Fan, Imagine That!, iowa90, jackrules158, Jadebud98, JEDH3*, Jo_Tunn, jukuma, kexia, KillerCookie*, Konstantein*, Korrye*, Kuroe, laden of the lamai*, Lady Inali*, LadyValentine*, Lainpinky131*, lalunereverie, Layla*, legacy14, Lenyx, Leon21*, Liberator600, Lifecharacter*, lilyboo12*, liquidenvy, Lloyd999, LostEmotions*, lovechanningforever, Lufia*, LunaSpirit*, mad_gater*, marksmanoftruth, MaxwellH*, Melty Cat, MetalSliver*, Michaelis_xXx_Elly, Midnightclub*, MirrorMirror1498*, Misa Amane San, Miss_Dreamer, Mistress of Disguise, mistsong99, mjlavalleejr*, Modesty*, Morgan, Mr. Baneling Squishy*, Mr. Crow, Mr_Doomed*, Mrs. Sara Banner*, MSN [Bot], MSNbot Media, N9inelives, Nami L'Chi*, NateStei*, Natzalia*, ncDragonfire, Nevan*, No-one-special*, Noxize*, Nulix, Oborosen*, Odinson, OFortune, OurStars*, OverTheRainbow, PeaceEntropy*, pieluver*, PinkPeppercorn, PirateofPie*, Polarisbear12, Porecomesis*, PrinceSakuma, Princess Awinita*, Protoman X, Purpl3_Flam3s*, qbsuperstar03*, R.T.M.X., RacoonMoon(), Raidose*, Raize*, rdaydreamer*, RichterGotz*, Romaneck, rpannier*, Rulke*, Runika, Ryuu Takeshi, Saarai, Saika, Saxious*, Scarlet Loup, Script*, Seveneleven*, shadereen, Shadetree76, Shadow44499*, Shpleem*, Shugo Seikatsu*, SkullsandSlippers, Skwidge*, Slipshock*, smellie_catt, Smokescreen*, Sokka25*, Something?*, Sorella*, spacefuneral*, Starlight77, Stella11, SugarPlum2*, SumErgoSum*, SuperNinjaRoo, supertoastgirl, Sweet Angel Jocelyn, Sylwyn, Syn_Maxwell, Talisman, Tearen Wover*, Technomancer*, teegaroo, Terminateher97*, Terrus*, The Broswagonist*, The Illusionist*, The Painkiller*, The*Lucky*Teacup, TheChaplain*, TheHaze, TheNoremac42, TheUnnamedOne, Tonks*, Tsukiakari*, TurtleSoup, twi-twi, Two*, UltraVioleta*, umbra Alastor, Vackattack, Valor, Varyar, Vestiline*, Vinn, VitaminHeart*, ViviOrunitiaFF9, Wanderer*, WhatsUpWazza*, Winds Of Fate*, WingedOctopus, wolfoftheage*, Xavier Graham, Xiiver, xoxMissClairexox, XShishioX*, YokoKitsune*, Yonbibuns*, ZacharyTC*, zane saphire*, Zaya06*, Zenia*, zeno3111*, Zitacamron95, zolarix*

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RolePlayGateway/~3/Hkuh03LZqOs/viewtopic.php

cam newton danielle fishel aaron rodgers FedEx Gabriel Aubry halle berry notre dame